I think you're confusing "faith" (especially in the religious sense) with the word "trust". I trust the hypothesis is true, and I will continue to do so as long as it remains valid, and until evidence proves otherwise.

But beyond that, since you and I live in the natural world, you undoubtedly put your trust in science, too. For example, you trust the science built into your computer will cause it to operate in a consistent manner each day. If it doesn't, if one morning an electrical surge suddenly fries the motherboard and your screen goes blank, no amount of faith in - or petitions to - a supernatural realm will restore it to working order (believe me I've tried). Eventually, you'll have to put your trust in science and technology to get it repaired. Or if your car runs out of gas, you understand you have to add refined petroleum to the fuel tank so it can flow through the gas-combustion engine where it's converted into energy to get the tires spinning again. Having faith that it will suddenly run on air, isn't going to get you where you're going. I could list thousands of similar examples, and you could probably think of thousands more but I think you get the idea.

Therefore, since we share the same basic trust in science, how can you criticize my position? Faith (in the religious sense) is something else above and beyond the realm of science and has no relevance here.

To further my point, here's a nifty illustration showing the difference between science and faith.