Sep
26
2011

Can a computer read your mind?

This story has been making the rounds in the news lately, Mind reading: This man can't actually read her mind, but scientists just might be able to.
Mind reading: This man can't actually read her mind, but scientists just might be able to.Courtesy Wikimedia Commons
describing a study in which a computer reconstructed video clips that subjects viewed. Participants in the experiment watched video clips while their brain activity was monitored by fMRI. Then the computer selected from millions of YouTube clips it had "seen" to make a composite video clip, some of which look eerily similar to the original videos that the participants watched.

No need to break out the tin foil hat just yet. Volunteers for this study had to lie motionless for hours for their brain activity to be scanned. But this technology could easily lead to systems of communication that aid patients whose normal channels of communication have broken down because they are paralyzed or even comatose. If you're interested, you can see the original paper here (subscription required). Take a look at some sample video from the study:

See video

Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)

Your Comments, Thoughts, Questions, Ideas

mdr's picture
mdr says:

This idea troubles me.

posted on Mon, 09/26/2011 - 4:10pm
KelsiDayle's picture
KelsiDayle says:

There's a Fringe episode that does something similar to this... Creepy. And totally cool.

posted on Tue, 09/27/2011 - 2:17pm
Shana's picture
Shana says:

I wonder if the parts of the brain activated while watching video are the same parts people would use to imagine or to reply memories, which we would need to know to make this technology work as a communication device. Or I guess you would just change the part of the brain you're observing? But something tells me it's a bit more complex than that. Where do the details go? Or is the limitation coming from YouTube?

posted on Tue, 09/27/2011 - 4:22pm
Ellen's picture
Ellen says:

Thanks for the comments, everyone!

If you're asking why the reconstructed images aren't as detailed as the images that the subjects viewed, it's because the computer had to pick the best matches from its training set--or rather it read the fMRI data of the subject and found the training image whose associated brain pattern most closely matched the pattern of the subject. For example, with the elephants walking in from the left, the closest images were just those with a dark shape on the left moving toward the right, because there were no clips of elephants in the training set that it could draw from.

posted on Mon, 10/03/2011 - 7:53pm
KelsiDayle's picture
KelsiDayle says:

I was talking to a friend about this paper and they suggested it might be used to capture someone's dreams. I though that was a neat application idea.

posted on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 12:39pm
astridB's picture
astridB says:

I believe computers can't read our minds.

posted on Sun, 10/02/2011 - 11:38pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <h3> <h4> <em> <i> <strong> <b> <span> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <object> <embed> <param> <sub> <sup>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may embed videos from the following providers vimeo, youtube. Just add the video URL to your textarea in the place where you would like the video to appear, i.e. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw0jmvdh.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options