The term "Immaculate conception" is not synonymous with "virgin birth". Don't get Gene started.
![]()
A modern blacktip shark: living a modern life on her own.
Courtesy Albert Kok
*The original headline here was "Immaculate conception observed. In a shark." However, it was pointed out to me that "immaculate conception" and "virgin birth" really aren't the same thing. I changed it, but I resent the implication that I don't know the difference. Just because I get things wrong all the time, it doesn't mean that I was wrong about this. Not, you know, necessarily.
It looks like lady sharks have won another battle of the sexes. The sex war had been fought to a standstill, a stalemate siege, if you will, with the male army relying on the “well, you’ll need us eventually” tactic.
Apparently this isn’t necessarily the case. Deep inside the female Fortress of Celibacy, a devious plan was being hatched: virgin birth.
(Many types of sharks, it should be noted, give live birth, like mammals, instead of laying eggs.)
There have, in fact, been two documented cases of ladies-only shark reproduction. The first was in the Omaha Zoo, where a female hammerhead shark unexpectedly gave birth to a baby shark (called a “pup”) in her tank. Unfortunately, some of the other sharks (of a different species) in her tank immediately ate the pup. Whoops. But DNA tests were done on the… leftover chunks of the pup, I guess, and they showed that the baby did not have a father.
The other case happened in May of last year, with the research results being released this last week (hey, sometimes science stays out all night and gets up late, so give it a break). A blacktip shark named Tidbit had been living at the Virginia Aquarium and Marine Science Center for the last eight years, with no contact with males sharks of her species. When Tidbit died mysteriously last May, an autopsy revealed her nearly full-term pregnancy (the stress-related complications of which were probably what did her in). The shark pup had died as well—and aquarium staff believed that it would have been eaten by the tiger sharks in the same tank anyway had it actually been born—but genetic testing revealed it to be Tidbit’s child, and Tidbit’s alone.
Scientists studying the bizarre pregnancies believe that the pups got all the required chromosomes when the mother’s egg split, and then reunited—a process called "parthogenesis.”
Single-sex reproduction, it’s believed, might be an adaptation to situations when there are too few male sharks in a wild population. It’s rare enough, however, that it would be very unlikely that sharks could survive through pathogenesis alone. The process results in a lack of genetic diversity as well, which could leave individuals vulnerable to congenital disorders.
So, ladies, I salute your ingenuity, but you’re not rid of us yet.
The term "Immaculate conception" is not synonymous with "virgin birth". Don't get Gene started.
Oh, you're right. But, really, Tidbit died before she could give birth, and "Virginal conception" doesn't have the same ring, does it? And, really, Tidbit could have been immaculately conceived herself.
Ooh, this stuff is so tricky!
Darn! I need to check the blog more frequently!
Wait - So how did they "observe" the conception?
Did you read the part about no males sharks being available?
All sharks have immaculate conception. That is they are born without the stain of original sin as we humans are. I think you mean virgin birth. If you choose to use blasphemous headlines at least get your terminology correct.
I'm afraid that I do choose to use blasphemous headlines. Not all the time, but sometimes.
However... you, my friend, are spot on. Unfortunately, we already covered the terminology of my blasphemy a few comments ago. So if y'all choose to be sassy, at least be original.
But I'll change the headline. Just for you.
what are you talking about?
sharks dom't eat clownfish
I think that this topic is extremely interesting. I never knew that sharks can live up to 150years! That is insane! Also the fact that they have 200 teeth, lose nearly all of them, and regrow them in a matter of days! I never realized how fasinating sharks can be/are!
Could these 2 examples be used to prove that the birth of Jesus could very well have been legit. Meaning that a woman could have conceived him without having intercourse with a man? Don't we look to the animal kingdom to explain things that we may not understand? I think this is a very interesting topic. If the animals could do it why not it be possible in humans? Also with the shark birth I dont think that it's ever been documented how sharks mate so maybe this is a normal process for them?
wow how is that possible for a shark to give birth with no opposite sex sharks around???
Add a new comment