Recently discovered tree puts “Methuselah” where it belongs: down.

by JGordon on Apr. 13th, 2008
in , , and
8
comments

Bristlecone pines are actually much smaller than this: So the chopping should be pretty easy.
Bristlecone pines are actually much smaller than this: So the chopping should be pretty easy.
Courtesy purplekey
The world has finally gotten sick of California’s bristlecone pine Methuselah, and offered up something better.

The bristlecone pines of the White Mountains in California are some of the oldest living objects in the world, with one individual, nicknamed “Methuselah,” having been aged at around 5,000 years. Now five thousand years is older than most people I know, but I don’t think that I’d go around calling those trees “super old” or anything. More along the lines of “kind of old,” and for decades we’ve had to put up with complaints over these kind-of-old trees (e.g. “Don’t cut it down! It’s kind of old!”) Since when has something being kind of old ever stopped us from destroying it?

Well, now Methuselah won’t even be able to play that card anymore, because its kind of old woody butt has been blown out of the water by a new old tree, an 8000-year-old Norway spruce, found, ironically, in Sweden. 8000 years—I think we can safely call that “pretty old.”

While an individual trunk of the spruce may only live about 600 years, the organism will put up a new one as soon as the old trunk dies, which has allowed some of the trees to survive since just about the end of the last ice age.
A cultivated dwarf spruce: This Norway spruce was made to be small, but the ancient stunted ones in Sweden probably look about the same.
A cultivated dwarf spruce: This Norway spruce was made to be small, but the ancient stunted ones in Sweden probably look about the same.
Courtesy SEWilco

The carbon-dated pretty-old tree was found in a cluster of similarly aged Norway spruces in the mountains of western Sweden, in an area that has remained untouched by commercial logging. The harsh environmental conditions of the area have forced the trees to stay very small—only about a foot and a half tall—but last several decades have brought a warmer climate to the area, and the trees have “popped up like mushrooms,” making them much easier to find in the mountainous terrain. This will also make them more fun for me to chop down when an older tree is found.

Update!
According to this article, one of the trees is 9,550 years old. There's actually a cluster of about twenty spruce that are at least 8,000 years old.

Your rating: None Average: 4 (3 votes)

Your Comments, Thoughts, Questions, Ideas

<em>andyshadexx</em>'s picture

i think it kinda harsh if we just cut the tree down just because we fund another older trees some where els.
But ok i guess,also plz try to save the environment!

posted on Thu, 04/17/2008 - 9:53am
<em>Looney_Tooney</em>'s picture

Yeah!
Dont Cut It Down Sheesh...

U Kno Wat Im Sayin!!!

posted on Thu, 04/17/2008 - 10:03am
<em>JGordon</em>'s picture
JGordon says:

Too late--the old (younger) tree has already been cut down. Turned out the thing was full of elves. I guess the saw went right through one of them. It sounded awful--literally.

posted on Fri, 04/18/2008 - 9:33am
<em>nelson.robin</em>'s picture

thats crazy man i think they shouldn't be so quick to cut a tree down man i swear they taken the animals home away lol fo real

posted on Mon, 05/05/2008 - 8:46am
Anonymous says:

Wow all I can say is with you're poor attitude, you're likely to never be admired or your blog to continue being read...

Cutting down trees because they're only 'kind of old" rather than, "pretty old"
Is extremely re-tard-ed.

thanks

posted on Sun, 05/11/2008 - 10:44pm
<em>JGordon</em>'s picture
JGordon says:

I'm not sure I see the connection.

Plus, my attitude is what got me to where I am today: Minnesota.

posted on Wed, 05/14/2008 - 11:06am
Anonymous says:

Methuselah is *gosh-darn* non-clonal. Who the *gee-golly* cares if a clonal species lives that long, they're just cloning themselves! Methuselah is an individual.

posted on Sun, 09/06/2009 - 7:30pm
<em>JGordon</em>'s picture
JGordon says:

Yo, Anon

Sorry—I had to change those f-bombs into something a little more ridiculous and a little less offensive.

But, as to your point: sure. But I hate cloned things as much as I hate old things, so it doesn't really make much of a difference in terms of what I'll be chopping down.

posted on Tue, 09/08/2009 - 10:41am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <h3> <h4> <em> <i> <strong> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <object> <embed> <param> <sub> <sup>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options