Roman soldier hides footprint in wall, scientists find it.

by JGordon on Aug. 27th, 2007
in
4
comments

The Caligae: Not to be worn with socks.  (image courtesy of Wikipedia Commons)
The Caligae: Not to be worn with socks. (image courtesy of Wikipedia Commons)
Archaeologists have uncovered a two thousand and change-year-old footprint of a Roman soldier inside a stone wall surrounding the ancient city of Hippos. The footprint is of a sandal typical of Roman soldiers, the caligae – a strapped, leather thing, with iron hobnails in its sole (for durability and for effective kicking).

The find is interesting in that it suggests that soldiers helped build the wall. Or, at least, that this soldier did.

I for one don’t see what the big deal is. I’ve been putting my footprints all over the place for years, including on the property of scientists, and they could hardly care less. And what has a legionary got over me? Nothing, obviously. I’m taller, I’m not dead, and I have never attacked a Goth person. These are all important factors in the sort of popularity contest we should be having here.

An interesting side note: Hippos is located in what is now Israel, in an area described by the New Testament to have been the location where Jesus performed miracles. The footprint may indicate that Hippos received some sort of miracle involving comfortable-yet-practical footwear. That’s my theory anyway.

The article

Your rating: None

Your Comments, Thoughts, Questions, Ideas

<em>wraithdrudge</em>'s picture

and?

posted on Wed, 10/15/2008 - 4:58pm
<em>JGordon</em>'s picture
JGordon says:

I don't know, dude—I think the "and" is up to you. I was just passing along some archaeological findings: a footprint was found in an ancient wall, and it matched up to the sort of sandals Roman soldiers wore. So, a Roman soldier stepped in that spot on that wall as it was being built, 2,000 years ago.

"And," if that's cool or not is up to you, I guess. What do you think?

posted on Wed, 10/15/2008 - 5:18pm
<em>EWatson02</em>'s picture
EWatson02 says:

I think it's cool. Then again, I'm pretty big on archaeology and history, so I suppose that shouldn't be any surprise. As to why it's cool, well, that's a little bit harder to explain, because I'm really tempted to say "it just IS!"

I dunno, I guess I just find it cool because I like the idea of that connection between past and present. It makes those long-gone eras seem a little bit more REAL, you know? It makes us realize that Ancient Rome is not this dusty, abstract idea that we keep on bookshelves, but something that real people lived and experienced.

Cheesy? Maybe, but I don't think archaeology would exist as a career or even as a hobby if other people didn't think the same thing.

posted on Wed, 10/15/2008 - 6:59pm
thechickenman says:

Archaeology has many pros and cons. I think archaeology is widely used for many areas in the world. Archaeology is great for studies for any old artifact.

posted on Thu, 10/16/2008 - 11:15am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <h3> <h4> <em> <i> <strong> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <object> <embed> <param>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options