i think that any of the choices would be fine- but i made my best choice
Yes definitely, I think that if they are doing stuff, than that's good. By the way, if you want to read about Pluto go onto my blog called should Pluto be a planet.
i think you are right about that
i think that the world was made tonothave the fortuneof the miserables be spent on goverment funding for scientific activity.
i dont think that kids know anything about this stuff but i guess thatt they are at a reasonable spending amount
I think we shouldat least figure out a way to improve our exploring, but at the same time spending less money!
s aved the money for the feature generation...
they are spending way to much on space how are we 15 trillion dollars in debt and yet can afford to spend 60million dollars per astronaut to send into space
I think that astronauts are cool, and we need to learn more about space. I agree with you about the money, but there might be a time when we need tot live on another planet!!!!!!
I think that we are spending to much money for the astronauts. I agree with that... but at the same time i thnk we kind of need astronauts. We need to know what is going on in space.
i know noooooooo need to wast money on them!!!!!
idk but they spend a lot :)
I think we should keep it the way it is... 0.5 is great!
so you think that nasa is not important anymore1
People are spending TOO much for space research!
NASA is important it should be given more than 0.5%.
Exploration is a part of who we are as humans; we need to invest in our ability to find out about the universe.
i think that more money should b spent, and im not just saying that to go w/ the flow. so please raise it up 2 10%........ thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think its really important to do research in your universe. maybe wwe can find recousrces out there and can stop wasting the plants earths, I think mother earth would like that, plus aliens....
Space exploration and research is impotant, but we should get the budget figured out first.
one day this planet will be over populated to the point were we wont have enough resources to give everyone there needs, we need to branch out and space is the only place we can go.....
we should explore space so the vulcans will make first contact with us.
I think .5% is way too little to be put into the funding of space exploration. There is so much to explore and not enough money put into the funding. Raise up the percentage more!!!
none nasa shut down
lol. not compleatly true, but essentially yes.
If we don't even take care of earth, what could be good about finding a new place for humans? just trash the earth and then take off? think we should focus on solving our problems here
that ia very very good point...!! if people trash this earth andleave it would happen all over again(:
there is not enough money being used for this thing.
I think the budjet is not enough!
Space is useless, unless ist's for watching the weather, or helping with a project. Let's face it we are scared of space, we have only ever put a man on the moon once, we never did it again. We aren't doing anything with it, so why have a funding for it. Maybe a little bit of money for the satelites, but that's pretty much should do it.
spend as much as you want
Best figure out how to live in space in case we destroy this planet one way or another.
I think that the cost should be lower, what with the U.S.'s giant debt. Because if it's too much, the U.S. will run out of money, and the government will have to "borrow" (aka, take and never give back) money from other coutries.
Biased question; leads to biased answers. For non-defence initiatives, the Private Sector needs to invest and pay for them lest we degenerate this great nation into another failed Communist state like USSR.
Colonists on Mars would be impossible if .5 is the funding for space exploration and knowledge. We need to further our existence and the only way for that is to learn to live on other planets besides our own. Up the budget.
More information about formatting options
Science Buzz is supported by the National Science Foundation.
Copyright © Science Museum of Minnesota, 2004-2013, except where noted.