That's how lotteries are often described. The odds of winning the top prize in the Mega Millions lottery is more than 600 times worse than your odds of getting hit by lightning. Yet people continue to play. Why?
Professor Lloyd Cohen suggests people aren't paying for the chance so much as they are paying for the dream. They enjoy fantasizing about winning, the same way people enjoy reading lifestyle magazines or watching movies of the rich and famous. And at one dollar a pop, a lottery ticket is not only cheaper than these other forms of entertainment, it actually has a chance -- no matter how infinitesimally tiny -- of actually paying off.
thats so dumb
I totally buy this theory.
I rarely, if ever, buy lottery tickets. But when I do, it's because of a big potential payout, and I spend the evening before the drawing thinking about what I'd do with the money if I won. Sometimes we even do it as a family even, comparing dreams and sometimes being surprised at what we learn about each other.
I know I won't win. But it's fun thinking about the endowments I'd create and the things I'd do if money were no obstacle.
I always liked what writer Fran Liebowitz had to say about it:
"I figure you have the same chances of winning the lottery whether you play it or not."
I had wanted to use that in the post, but couldn't figure out how to make it fit! Thanks! ;-)
Tell that to the winners
even though i hate math, i think its ridiculous that people are taxed for being bad at math.
It's a joke. People aren't really taxed. What it means is, the government sells the lottery tickets, and you'd have to be pretty bad at math to think buying one was a good idea.
Math is a great thing in your life and it may be tough sometimes but it is an important thing in your lifetime....you use it all the time in almost everything... Even though I don't like science calculating it is the funnest part! oh ya math is good... ya know
That is really lame for being who is being tax for not being really good in math. Ugh that is really stupid people getting taxed for not being good in math..
I know!!!
I think people should just get taxed for not being thorough readers, you know?
this is DO -- can't change the user name -- stuck on kwlundy. In any case, if you buy a lottery ticket your chance of winning is not zero. More properly it approaches zero. The difference? You do have a chance at winning, however slight, and, yes, you can think about early retirement or buying your dream home or whatever. Once again, Gene comments on human behavior and psychology which is outside his realm.
The line you refer to was posted not by me, but by mdr. A tax on poor readers, indeed!
As a human, I would argue that our behavior and psychology are well within my realm.
In some ways being human makes it difficult to understand other humans' behavior. Hard to get outside ones own perceptions, emotions, experience, etc.
Then that would make us equal.
that stinks
It appears the tough economy is at least putting the squeeze on people betting on the ponies. Here are more details. No word on if the tight economy is improving people's mathematical understanding.
every one is good at something like i'm good at math
Dave Ramsey says this, too. It's too true! :)
Post new comment