Nuclear test detection: photo from wikimedia
James Acton of Vertic, an independent non-governmental organisation (NGO) in London that specialises in verification research, noted enormous discrepancies in the estimated size of the blast.
“I’ve heard from three different sources that it (the North Korean blast) was less than one kilotonne,” “If it turns out to be less than a kilotonne, it could look very much like a fizzle,” a bomb that failed to detonate properly and achieve a full chain reaction," said Acton, a nuclear physicist by training. Kahleej Times.
Russian Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov, however, has been quoted as saying that the nuclear device tested by North Korea ranged between five and 15 kilotons. That is the normal size of a successful test.
Like earthquakes, large explosions send out shockwaves that can be detected on seismographs. Big nuclear bombs make big waves, with clear signatures that make them fairly easy to detect, analyze and confirm that they were caused by splitting atoms. But smaller blasts - as North Korea's appears to have been - are trickier to break down. York Daily Record
A nuclear explosion has a more instant shockwave than a chemical one. The differences between regular bombs and a nuclear explosion are very fine and subtle, and you need time to analyse the signatures.
"People have different way of cross cutting the data and interpreting them,"
The CTBTO's stations are more extensive than those used by most countries. They monitor seismic events but also underwater data, radioactive particles in the air and radiowaves.
"Within 72 hours we will have full data. Then all this will be available to member states," said Lassina Zerbo, director of the International Data Center at the CTBTO, which is based in Vienna, Austria.
While the North Korean explosion was small, potentially complicating monitoring efforts, sensors in South Korea were likely close enough to categorize it as nuclear, if that is what is was, said Friedrich Steinhaeusler, professor of physics at Salzburg University.
A nuclear blast also gives off a clear signature - a clear graph of peaks and curves - that differentiates it from other kinds of shocks, he added.
"We'll have the confirmation soon," he said.
Additional reading can be found on Rueters.
For updates I recommend this Wikipedia page
Gizmodo just put up some graphs putting nuclear weapons of various countries in perspective (how many and how big).
More scientific tests confirmed that North Korea has carried out nuclear detonation. The US national intelligence director, John Negroponte said that radioactive materials had been found in atmospheric samples taken a couple days after the explosion.
I am curious how they made these tests exactly but probably won't ever know for sure. In general you would want to fly a plane over or near the area and look for high amounts of cesium and cobalt which would be produced in unnatural amounts by the explosion. But last week Japanese officials had said that they didn't think they would be able to confirm explosion since these test weren't showing up as conclusive.
In a realm of science as secretive as nuclear detection nothing can be said for sure.
Post new comment